<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s first?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/</link>
	<description>Charming his way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Although there may be kudos associated with &quot;being first&quot; (and even that is debateable), it is inevitably short-lived, unless you use that headstart to make your proposition the best. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Companies in particular are struggling to provide &quot;the best&quot; - perhaps not surprising given the clunky nature of the SL environment at the moment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Whereas libraries, universities and other eductional institutions seem to be far more imaginative in their use of the environment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It frustrates me that my own company is still resistant, despite the hordes of companies pouring into SL, but I have at least had the time to assess the successes and failures of the early adopters. It&#039;s not called &quot;the bleeding edge&quot; for nothing!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;After the pioneers come the farmers, and they&#039;re the ones who exploit the environment fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although there may be kudos associated with &#8220;being first&#8221; (and even that is debateable), it is inevitably short-lived, unless you use that headstart to make your proposition the best. </p>
<p>Companies in particular are struggling to provide &#8220;the best&#8221; &#8211; perhaps not surprising given the clunky nature of the SL environment at the moment.</p>
<p>Whereas libraries, universities and other eductional institutions seem to be far more imaginative in their use of the environment.</p>
<p>It frustrates me that my own company is still resistant, despite the hordes of companies pouring into SL, but I have at least had the time to assess the successes and failures of the early adopters. It&#8217;s not called &#8220;the bleeding edge&#8221; for nothing!</p>
<p>After the pioneers come the farmers, and they&#8217;re the ones who exploit the environment fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franscharming.com/2007/01/30/whos-first/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Some classic observations on being first vs being best, and in no particular order...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. Be First, Be Last, Be Different!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. The pioneers go up front - they are the ones who get the arrows through their necks!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. Quote from Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach: &quot;The gulls who scorn perfection for the sake of travel go nowhere, slowly; Those who put aside travel for the sake of perfection go anywhere, instantly&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I guess, on balance, this lot comes out in favour of being best rather than first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some classic observations on being first vs being best, and in no particular order&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Be First, Be Last, Be Different!</p>
<p>2. The pioneers go up front &#8211; they are the ones who get the arrows through their necks!</p>
<p>3. Quote from Jonathan Livingston Seagull by Richard Bach: &#8220;The gulls who scorn perfection for the sake of travel go nowhere, slowly; Those who put aside travel for the sake of perfection go anywhere, instantly&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess, on balance, this lot comes out in favour of being best rather than first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

