Comments on: Concurrency of 21115 http://franscharming.com/2007/01/01/concurrency-of-21115/ Charming his way Sat, 16 May 2009 11:25:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Anonymous http://franscharming.com/2007/01/01/concurrency-of-21115/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:22:00 +0000 http://franscharming.com/2007/01/01/concurrency-of-21115/#comment-179 Definitly. I know it goes against popular belief, but lately on normal incident free days the peak concurrency doesn't seem to be a problem.<br/><br/>Now i admit there where some incidents , and sure there will be more. But things are getting better. Definitly. I know it goes against popular belief, but lately on normal incident free days the peak concurrency doesn’t seem to be a problem.

Now i admit there where some incidents , and sure there will be more. But things are getting better.

]]> By: Khamon Fate http://franscharming.com/2007/01/01/concurrency-of-21115/comment-page-1/#comment-177 Khamon Fate Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:37:00 +0000 http://franscharming.com/2007/01/01/concurrency-of-21115/#comment-177 Does it really seem to you that it's behaving much better under greater concurrency loads? Seriously? Does it really seem to you that it’s behaving much better under greater concurrency loads? Seriously?

]]>